Oleh: Yustin Nur Faizah, S.Tr.,Ak.,M.Ak.,AK.
As public awareness of sustainability issues continues to rise, companies are increasingly eager to publish sustainability reports that highlight their commitment to environmental, social, and governance (ESG) principles. However, behind the polished presentation of green indicators, a troubling trend has emerged: the practice of greenwashing.
Greenwashing refers to the deliberate attempt by companies to create a false impression of their environmental responsibility. In the context of sustainability reporting, this practice can take various forms, including the selective disclosure of positive information, omission of data that may harm the company’s image, and the use of persuasive visuals or graphs designed to influence perceptions without substantive evidence.
This practice functions as a subtle marketing strategy, where companies embed sustainability narratives within official reports to cultivate stakeholder trust, enhance brand reputation, and secure access to market incentives aligned with green initiatives. In the short term, such efforts may effectively attract investors and appeal to environmentally conscious consumers.
From an ethical standpoint, greenwashing constitutes a form of information manipulation that undermines the integrity of sustainability reporting. It corrodes the core principles of corporate accountability and obstructs progress toward sustainable development goals. When sustainability reports serve as propaganda rather than tools of transparency, they jeopardize public trust in the business sector.
Numerous academic studies have demonstrated that greenwashing is frequently linked to earnings management and financial reporting fraud. This indicates that greenwashing is not an isolated phenomenon but rather part of a broader pattern of corporate manipulation. Within a forensic accounting framework, greenwashing can be examined as a potential indicator of unethical intent or deliberate misrepresentation of information.
Therefore, there is a pressing need to strengthen regulations and enforce more rigorous sustainability reporting standards subject to independent audits. The advancement of measurable and comparable ESG frameworks, such as the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) and the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB), must be complemented by robust verification processes and active third-party oversight.
Moreover, academics, auditors, and accounting professionals play a vital role in educating both the public and the business community about the ethical boundaries of sustainability communication. It is time for sustainability to move beyond mere slogans and be translated into tangible actions that are both morally sound and professionally accountable. Thus, tackling greenwashing goes beyond image enhancement it is essential for preserving the integrity of a fair and sustainable economic system.
Sumber Referensi:
- Delmas, M. A., & Burbano, V. C. (2011). The Drivers of Greenwashing. California Management Review, 54(1), 64–87. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2011.54.1.64
- Lyon, T. P., & Montgomery, A. W. (2015). The Means and End of Greenwash. Organization & Environment, 28(2), 223–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026615575332
- Cho, C. H., Laine, M., Roberts, R. W., & Rodrigue, M. (2015). Organized hypocrisy, organizational façades, and sustainability reporting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 40, 78–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2014.12.003
- Hummel, K., & Schlick, C. J. (2016). The relationship between sustainability performance and sustainability disclosure – Reconciling voluntary disclosure theory and legitimacy theory. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 35(5), 455–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2016.06.001
- Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). (2021). GRI Standards. https://www.globalreporting.org
- International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB). (2022). IFRS Sustainability Disclosure Standards. https://www.ifrs.org/groups/international-sustainability-standards-board
- Simnett, R., Vanstraelen, A., & Chua, W. F. (2009). Assurance on Sustainability Reports: An International Comparison. The Accounting Review, 84(3), 937–967. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2009.84.3.937